That's why the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) intervened, arguing: "Because the same general framework applies to all plaintiffs, an overly lax approach to internet jurisdiction may open the door to disorderly misuse and overcrowding of our courts.”.
From http://ift.tt/2hPtR16
That's why the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) intervened, arguing: "Because the same general framework applies to all plaintiffs, an overly lax approach to internet jurisdiction may open the door to disorderly misuse and overcrowding of our courts.”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Kindly leave your comments here but the author reserves the right to include or exclude comments where deemed necessary.