Court Reverse $25 Million Copyright Verdict Against Cox Communications

Cox defended itself by arguing that it was protected by the federal copyright law's so-called "safe harbor" provisions, which immunize Internet service providers from liability for users' activity -- provided that the ISPs have policies for handling repeat offenders. But BMG convinced a judge that those ...
From http://ift.tt/2nss7um

Cox defended itself by arguing that it was protected by the federal copyright law's so-called "safe harbor" provisions, which immunize Internet service providers from liability for users' activity -- provided that the ISPs have policies for handling repeat offenders. But BMG convinced a judge that those ...